Are you looking to acquire another company or merge with another business? If so, you’ll need to understand the two primary accounting methods used in these scenarios: the pooling of interest method and the purchase method.
The pooling of interest method involves combining the financial statements as if the companies have always been a single entity, while the purchase method treats the transaction as an acquisition and records the assets and liabilities at their fair values at the acquisition date.
Pooling of Interest vs. Purchase Method
| Pooling of Interest Method | Purchase Method |
|---|---|
| Pooling of Interest Method was an accounting method used for business combinations where the merging companies’ financial statements were combined as if they had always been one entity. | Purchase Method is an accounting method used for business combinations where the acquiring company records the acquired company as an investment and recognizes the assets and liabilities at fair value. |
| It could be used when certain criteria were met, such as when the transaction met specific conditions of a “true merger” and there was substantial continuity of ownership. | It is typically used when the acquisition transaction does not meet the criteria for applying the Pooling of Interest Method or if the fair value of the acquired company’s net assets can be reliably measured. |
| In the Pooling of Interest Method, the historical financial statements of the merging companies were combined, restated, and presented as if the companies had always been consolidated. | In the Purchase Method, the historical financial statements of the acquired company are not restated or combined with the acquiring company’s financial statements. The acquired company’s assets and liabilities are recognized at fair value. |
| It resulted in no immediate impact on the earnings of the merging companies because their financial statements were combined as if they had always been one entity. | It can result in immediate changes to the earnings of the acquiring company due to the recognition of the acquired company’s assets and liabilities at fair value and potential goodwill or bargain purchase gain. |
| In the Pooling of Interest Method, the consolidated financial statements were prepared using the same accounting policies as the individual companies prior to the merger. | In the Purchase Method, the acquiring company continues to report its financial statements using its existing accounting policies, and the acquired company’s financials are consolidated and adjusted to align with the acquirer’s policies. |
| It requires specific regulatory approvals or exemptions to be applied since it involves combining the financial statements of the merging companies as if they had always been consolidated. | It typically does not require specific regulatory approvals related to accounting treatment, as it is a widely accepted method for business combinations. |
What is the Pooling of Interest Method?
The pooling of interest method is an accounting approach used to combine the financial statements of two or more companies involved in a business combination. Under this method, the financial statements of the merging companies are combined as if they have always been a single entity.
The assets, liabilities, and equity of the merging companies are recorded at their historical book values, and no goodwill is recognized. The pooling of interest method is no longer allowed under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and has been replaced by the purchase method.
What is the Purchase Method?
The purchase method is an accounting approach used to record a business combination, where one company acquires another. Under the purchase method, the acquiring company recognizes the fair values of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interests.
Goodwill is also recognized as the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired. The financial statements of the acquired company are consolidated with those of the acquiring company, reflecting the impact of the acquisition on the combined entity’s financial position and performance.
The purchase method is the preferred accounting treatment for business combinations under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Advantages and disadvantages of each method
Advantages of the pooling of interest method:
- Simplicity and ease of implementation.
- Avoidance of recognizing goodwill.
Disadvantages of the pooling of interest method:
- Limited applicability and strict criteria.
- Potential lack of transparency in financial reporting.
Advantages of the purchase method:
- Reflects fair values and provides a more accurate financial picture.
- Greater transparency and disclosure of goodwill.
Disadvantages of the purchase method:
- Complexity and time-consuming fair value determination.
- Impact on financial ratios and future performance assessments.
How to choose between the two methods
- First, consider the size of the companies involved and whether they are similar in size. If the companies are very different in size, it may be difficult to find an accurate way to combine their assets and liabilities.
- Second, think about what type of information you want to include in your financial statements. The pooling of interest method requires pro forma information about both companies to be included in the financial statements, while the purchase method only requires historical information from the acquired company.
- Third, consider the tax implications of each method. The pooling of interest method often results in a lower tax bill than the purchase method, so it may be a better choice if you are looking to minimize your taxes. Speak with your accountant or financial advisor to get their professional opinion on which method is right for your business.
Key differences between Pooling of Interest and Purchase Method
- Basis of Combination: The pooling of Interest Method combines the financial statements as if the companies have always been a single entity, while the Purchase Method treats the transaction as an acquisition.
- Recognition of Goodwill: The pooling of Interest Method does not recognize goodwill, whereas the Purchase Method recognizes goodwill as the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired.
- Fair Value Determination: The pooling of Interest Method does not require the determination of fair values of assets and liabilities, while the Purchase Method requires the recognition of fair values.
- Applicability: The pooling of Interest Method has limited applicability and strict criteria that must be met, while the Purchase Method is the preferred accounting treatment for most business combinations.
- Difference between LIFO and FIFO
- Difference between simple and compound interest
- Difference between Operating and Financial leverage
Conclusion
The Pooling of Interest Method, although no longer widely used, offers simplicity and avoids the recognition of goodwill. While the Purchase Method, the preferred accounting treatment, provides a more accurate reflection of the fair values of assets and liabilities, includes the recognition of goodwill, and offers greater transparency in financial reporting. Understanding the differences between these methods is crucial for businesses to comply with applicable accounting standards and accurately represent the financial impact of business combinations.
